Overview: Navigating Growth Through Acquisition
In the rapidly evolving IT services sector, an emerging player had identified a unique opportunity: acquiring small businesses from retiring owners to fuel its expansion. This approach provided the company with access to established customer bases and skilled workforces and allowed it to scale quickly in a competitive market. The acquisition strategy was clear—close 5-6 deals per year and integrate the businesses into its broader operational framework.
However, as the company embarked on this ambitious journey, its corporate development team faced several operational challenges. Managing multiple live deals simultaneously, each with varying complexity, began to strain the team’s resource team, which was tasked with juggling disparate legal teams, document versions, and timelines across a pipeline of deals while keeping a close eye on the bottom line.
This case examines how the company's traditional tools, such as virtual data rooms (VDRs) and fragmented legal processes, created inefficiencies and rising costs. It also explores how adopting RedlineDCS, a collaborative deal platform, helped streamline its operations, reduce legal expenses, and position the company to achieve its growth targets.
As the company learned, the growth path isn’t just about making the right acquisitions—it’s about having the right tools to manage the process efficiently.
The Situation: Scaling Through Acquisition But Facing Operational Hurdles
In early 2024, an IT-managed services provider (MSP) reached a crucial point in its expansion. With a market of opportunities, the company set its sights on acquiring small businesses from retiring owners, positioning itself as a dominant player in lower-middle market digital services provider. Their approach was straightforward: identify profitable, well-run businesses bring them under the company’s umbrella, and realize economies of scale to enhance their performance.
The company's corporate development team, led by the head and supported by the director, executed the acquisition strategy. With a robust pipeline of opportunities, the team targeted 5 to 6 deals per year. However, they managed multiple live deals simultaneously, introducing significant operational complexity.
A Fragmented Process: A Solution through Deal Software
One of the team's most significant challenges was the fragmentation of their deal processes. Given the range of deal sizes and structures, the team frequently used outside counsel from multiple law firms based on the nature of each transaction. Small deals were handled by local legal advisors familiar with regional nuances, while more significant, more complex acquisitions required the expertise of seasoned M&A specialists. This approach added a layer of complexity to every transaction, as the team often had to manage several law firms concurrently, each with its approach, timelines, and expectations.
Adding to the complexity, traditional virtual data rooms (VDRs) were the team’s go-to for managing documents. While VDRs offered security, they were limited in scope and functionality. The legal advisors working on different aspects of the deals frequently faced confusion over document versions and struggled to collaborate efficiently. As a result, the deal team found itself buried under redundant administrative tasks, managing multiple document versions, chasing down approvals, and reconciling information across disparate systems.
Operational Strain and Rising Costs
As the team ramped up its acquisition activities, these inefficiencies became more pronounced. Legal costs started escalating, primarily driven by the back-and-forth on document revisions between the internal team and outside counsel. Without precise version control, lawyers often had to repeat work, inadvertently increasing the firm’s legal big firm. Meanwhile, the corporate development team found that their time was increasingly spent on administrative tasks rather than closing deals or identifying new opportunities.
With the IT firm’s growth stalling, it became evident that the current tools and processes were unsustainable. To achieve their target of 5-6 closed deals annually, they would need to streamline their workflows, reduce legal costs, and introduce a more efficient way to manage documents and communications.
At this critical juncture, the company decided to adopt RedlineDCS, a platform designed to simplify the M&A process through real-time collaboration, version control, and workflow automation.
The Solution: RedlineDCS Brings Order to the Chaos
Acknowledging the necessity for a more cohesive approach, the deal team transitioned to RedlineDCS, a deal software solution. Unlike traditional VDRs, which merely store documents, RedlineDCS provides a collaborative platform explicitly designed for M&A professionals. It offers real-time document collaboration, advanced version control, and workflow automation.
Key Features that Made the Difference:
Real-Time Document Collaboration: With RedlineDCS, all stakeholders could review, edit, and comment on documents within the platform in real time. Gone were the days of downloading, editing, and re-uploading multiple versions of the same file. Every change was tracked, timestamped, and visible to the entire team, eliminating version confusion and streamlining communication.
Centralized Communication Hub: Instead of relying on fragmented email threads, RedlineDCS provided an integrated communication tool that allowed the deal team to ask questions, request edits, and negotiate terms directly in the platform. The team could tag relevant stakeholders, keeping everyone informed and significantly speeding up decision-making.
Automated Workflows: RedlineDCS automated many of the deal’s most time-consuming tasks, such as tracking non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and managing signature approvals. This allowed the deal team to keep the deal moving forward without manual intervention.
Legal Savings with Version Control: RedlineDCS’s system literally kept all parties on the same page. Legal counsel no longer had to sift through multiple drafts of documents to find the latest version, cutting down on unnecessary billable hours. The platform’s communications ensured that lawyers only reviewed documents when they were in their final form, leading to a 4x return on the deal team's subscriptteam's RedlineDCS compared to their legal savings alone.
The Result: A Fast-Tracked Deal with Lower Costs
By integrating RedlineDCS into its M&A process, the team achieved the following results:
Time to Close: The platform shaved weeks off the estimated closing time, allowing the team to take advantage of favorable market conditions before interest rates shifted.
Legal Cost Reduction: By implementing automated workflows and version control, the deal team experienced significant reductions in legal fees, amounting to tens of thousands of dollars per deal.
Increased Efficiency: With centralized communication and real-time collaboration, back-and-forth document exchanges decreased by over 50%, reducing administrative overhead.
The deal team's subscription, RedlineDCS, generated a 4x ROI through legal savings alone.
The Takeaway: Dealmakers Need More Than a VDR
In today’s fast-paced landscape, simply using a traditional VDR isn’t enough to keep deals on track. RedlineDCS' customer experience underscores the growing importance of adopting collaborative deal platforms like RedlineDCS that manage documents, streamline workflows, reduce costs, and increase efficiency.
Written by Ryan Langston, Customer Success Manager at RedlineDCS.
Comments